← Back to the archive

MYS-013 · Mysteries

Flight 19 disappearance

Unresolved means the reviewed evidence does not settle the stated question; it is not evidence of a supernatural cause. Reports, hypotheses and established findings are distinguished.

The case record

What was reported?

Five US Navy Avenger aircraft and fourteen personnel disappeared during a navigation exercise on 5 December 1945. Recorded communications favour disorientation followed by fuel exhaustion and a sea landing in worsening conditions.

The flight departed Fort Lauderdale for a route over the Bahamas. Radio exchanges indicate uncertainty about position and headings. A separate Mariner sent to search also disappeared with thirteen men; naval history considers an in-flight fire probable for that aircraft.

Both the training loss and rescue loss occurred that day. Marker is the departure/training region, not a recovered aircraft location.

Reported date
5 December 1945
Witnesses
Historical records, investigators and observers; see case-specific account · Not reliably reducible to a single count
Investigation
Historical and research accounts reviewed from: Naval History and Heritage Command

Evidence in the record

Radio interceptsOfficial accident reportsFlight plan

Radio intercepts, the exercise plan and official accident reports survive. No wreck has been conclusively identified as belonging to Flight 19. A later correction changed the formal attribution of blame, which should not be confused with discovering a different cause.

Competing explanations

Official and research context

Naval historical analysis favours navigational disorientation, fuel exhaustion and deteriorating weather; the likely rescue-plane fire is considered separately.

Conventional explanations

Navigation error, communication difficulties, dwindling fuel and poor weather form a coherent conventional sequence. The rescue aircraft’s likely fire is a separate event. Bermuda Triangle folklore combines the losses without establishing a shared extraordinary mechanism.

Arguments that remain contested

The exact ditching position and the full cockpit decision sequence remain unconfirmed.

Locations & timeline

Coordinates are representative. Area and route labels do not imply exact paths or object positions.

  1. Primary reference location

    Flight 19 training region

    Both the training loss and rescue loss occurred that day. Marker is the departure/training region, not a recovered aircraft location.

    Representative case location · Approximate area radius: 500 km

    26.100°, -80.150° · point · Regional reference only; not survey-grade

Record notes

Map coordinates are representative and do not establish an exact incident position.

Case-specific sources researched 8 September 2026. Further access/editorial review noted.

Original dataset status: partially-explained

The conversation around the evidence

What do you make of the record?

0 case views

Assess the evidence, rather than the people involved. Community votes express reader opinion and do not change the case’s public status.

Discussion & submitted updates (0)

No contributions yet. Start with a question about the evidence.

Moderation & appeals · Corrections and source updates